Journal of Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology

Register      Login

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 1 ( January-December, 2025 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Mind in Motion (A Systematic Review Study): Unraveling the Effectiveness of Cognitive-intensive Physical Interventions in Enhancing Attention in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Komal Naruka, Surendra Kumar Meena, Neha Jain

Keywords : Attention, Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Cognition, Occupational therapy, Systematic review, Therapeutic activities

Citation Information : Naruka K, Meena SK, Jain N. Mind in Motion (A Systematic Review Study): Unraveling the Effectiveness of Cognitive-intensive Physical Interventions in Enhancing Attention in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. J Mahatma Gandhi Univ Med Sci Tech 2025; 10 (1):1-5.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10057-0237

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 10-03-2025

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2025; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aims and background: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is now recognized as the most common neurobehavioral disorder of childhood, affecting children from their earliest infancy through school and into adult life. Estimates suggest that ADHD affects 10–20% of the school-age population. ADHD is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by difficulties in sustaining attention. Usually starting in youth, the disorder can continue throughout adulthood. This study aims to review existing literature to analyze the effectiveness of cognitive activities in improving attention and executive function (EF) problems in ADHD. Methods: Databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, and others were extensively searched for studies published from 2014 to the present. Included studies investigated the effectiveness of various cognitive activities in improving attention and EF as well as associated problems in children with ADHD. Data extraction and quality assessments were completed in accordance with preset standards. Results: Overall, 10 studies that met the inclusion criteria were examined, where various activities based on cognitive rehabilitation to improve attention and EF were evaluated. Findings suggest that all activities were effective in improving attention and EF, some more than others. Conclusion: Overall, this review reveals promising potential benefits of cognitive-intensive physical interventions and emphasizes the importance of further research, including well-designed clinical trials and longitudinal studies, to validate and refine the observed trends. However, a comprehensive approach that combines various interventions tailored to individual needs remains crucial. Clinical significance: This study aims to empower these stakeholders with a practical and accessible tool for improving attention and EF problems in children with attention deficit disorder through a literature review, aiding in early identification and intervention design. It will provide valuable insights for practitioners, therapists, parents, and caregivers, improving patient outcomes and promoting inclusive educational practices.


PDF Share
  1. Shaywitz SE, Shaywitz BA. Presentation to the uncommon arrangement on attention deficit disorder. J Learn Disabil 1991;24(2):68–71. DOI: 10.1177/002221949102400202
  2. Hahn-Markowitz J, Manor I, Maeir A. Effectiveness of cognitive–functional (Cog-Fun) intervention with children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a pilot study. Am J Occup Ther 2011;65(4):384–392. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2011.000901
  3. Littbrand H, Stenvall M, Rosendahl E. Applicability and effects of physical exercise on physical and cognitive functions and activities of daily living among people with dementia: a systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2011;90(6):495–518. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318214de26
  4. Gardiner E, Iarocci G. Everyday executive function predicts adaptive and internalizing behavior among children with and without autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res 2018;11(2):284–295. DOI: 10.1002/aur.1877
  5. Drechsler R, Brem S, Brandeis D, et al. ADHD: current concepts and treatments in children and adolescents. Neuropediatrics 2020;51(5):315–335. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701658
  6. Willcutt EG, Nigg JT, Pennington BF. Validity of DSM-IV attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptom dimensions and subtypes. J Abnorm Psychol 2012;121(4):991–1010. DOI: 10.1037/a0027347
  7. Ward MF, Wender PH, Reimherr FW. The Wender Utah rating scale: an aid in the retrospective diagnosis of childhood attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1993;150(6):885–890. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.150.6.885
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.