Journal of Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology

Register      Login

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 1 ( January-December, 2023 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Rehabilitation of Anterior Maxilla Using Static Three-dimensional-guided Implant Surgery: A Case Report

Riddhi Dhadda, Narendra Padiyar

Keywords : Case report, Cone-beam computed tomography, Implant surgery, Real guide software, Rehabilitation

Citation Information : Dhadda R, Padiyar N. Rehabilitation of Anterior Maxilla Using Static Three-dimensional-guided Implant Surgery: A Case Report. J Mahatma Gandhi Univ Med Sci Tech 2023; 8 (1):33-37.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10057-0247

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 19-10-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Abstract

The introduction of digital dentistry and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology has redefined treatment concepts in implant dentistry—computer-guided implant placement has become routine practice, and CAD/CAM prostheses are now commonplace. These advances in treatment options and modalities have led to a paradigm shift in the workflow of surgical and restorative treatments. This case report presents a customized staged treatment protocol that involves the discussion and critical evaluation of the parameters influencing the dependability of three-dimensional implant planning and static guided implant placement utilizing surgical templates. The treatment protocol also describes an integrated digital and conventional workflow for implant-supported fixed prosthetic rehabilitations of anterior maxillary region to provide improved patient care with more predictable outcomes and fewer complications.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505–511.
  2. Vercruyssen M, Laleman I, Jacobs R, et al. Computer-supported implant planning and guided surgery: a narrative review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26(Suppl 11):69–76.
  3. Misir AF, Sumer M, Yenisey M, et al. Effect of surgical drill guide on heat generated from implant drilling. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67(12):2663–2668.
  4. Dreiseidler T, Tandon D, Kreppel M, et al. CBCT device dependency on the transfer accuracy from computer-aided implantology procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23(9):1089–1097.
  5. Colombo M, Mangano C, Mijiritsky E, et al. Clinical applications and effectiveness of guided implant surgery: a critical review based on randomized controlled trials. BMC Oral Health 2017;17:150.
  6. Hultin M, Svensson K G, Trulsson M. Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:124–135.
  7. Schubert O, Schweiger J, Stimmelmayr M, et al. Digital implant planning and guided implant surgery - workflow and reliability. Br Dent J 2019;226(2):101–108.
  8. Schneider D, Sax C, Sancho-Puchades M, et al. Accuracy of computer-assisted, template-guided implant placement compared with conventional implant placement by hand - an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2021;32(9):1052–1060.
  9. Jivraj S, Reshad M, Chee WW. Transitioning patients from teeth to implants utilizing fixed restorations. J Calif Dent Assoc 2008;36(8):599–606.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.