Journal of Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2020 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Sexual Dimorphism in the Permanent Maxillary First Molar Teeth in the Rajasthan Population

Suresh Sharma, Shantnu Sharma

Keywords : Mesiodistal, Odontological, Sexual dimorphism,Buccolingual

Citation Information : Sharma S, Sharma S. Sexual Dimorphism in the Permanent Maxillary First Molar Teeth in the Rajasthan Population. J Mahatma Gandhi Univ Med Sci Tech 2020; 5 (1):4-8.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10057-0119

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 15-02-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction: Sex estimation in forensic science is an essential step for medicolegal purposes. Teeth are an excellent material for anthropological, odontological, genetic, and forensic investigations as they are known to resist a variety of ante-mortem and post-mortem insults. Sexual dimorphism is an indicator of gender differences that can be observed in several aspects of the human skeleton such as the pelvis, cranium, femur, humerus, canines, and other structures. Maxillary first molars are the first permanent teeth to erupt into the oral cavity at the mean age of 6–7 years and are less commonly impacted as compared to canines. The purpose of this study was to indicate whether sexual dimorphism also exists in the first maxillary molar of humans. Aim: To determine the sexual dimorphism in the permanent maxillary first molar teeth using the mesiodistal and buccolingual crown width. Materials and methods: The present study was performed on 80 patients from the National Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jaipur. Mesiodistal and buccolingual width were measured on the basis of intraoral examination and plaster modal with the help of Vernier caliper. Sexual dimorphism (in percentage) was calculated from these measured parameters. Results: The mean values of right and left mesiodistal width and buccolingual width were less for females than for males and the differences were statistically significant for buccolingual width but nonsignificant for mesiodistal width. The sexual dimorphism was slightly greater on the right side than the left side. Buccolingual width of right maxillary molar teeth shows maximum sexual dimorphism among all measurements (both intraoral 5.13% and cast 5.18%). Conclusion: This study signifies the possible role of morphometric study of canine teeth in estimation of gender and it can be used in forensic investigations where gender determination of skeletal remains is difficult.


PDF Share
  1. Shireen A, Ara SA, Azzeghaiby SN, et al. Sex determination potential from canine tooth dimensions. British J Medic Med Res 2014;4(32):5133–5143. DOI: 10.9734/BJMMR/2014/11005.
  2. More C, Patel P, Peter R. Analysis of Palatal Rugae pattern in Indian and Nepalese population - a comparative study. J Oral Med, Oral Surg, Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2015;1(3):108–113.
  3. More C, Patil R, Asrani M, et al. Cheiloscopy – A Review. Indian J Foren Med Toxicol 2009;3(1):17–20.
  4. Dharman S, Gnanasundaram N, Gopal M, et al. Phenotypic differences in teeth dimensions among Chennai population: An aid in sex determination. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2015;27(2):171–177.
  5. Mirza FH, Siddiqui MM, Memon AA, et al. Gender determination using canine mandibular index, a new perspective in forensic odontology. MC Supplement 2012(Suppl):52–54.
  6. Kaushal S, Patnaik VVG, Agnihotri G. Mandibular canines in sex determination. J Anat Soc India 2003;52(2):119–124.
  7. Aggarwal B, Vasudeva K, Kaushal S, et al. Gender based comparison of intercanine distance of mandibular permanent canine in different populations. JPAFMAT 2008;8(2):6–9.
  8. Filipovic G, Kanjevac T, Cetenovic B, et al. Sexual dimorphism in the dimensions of teeth in Serbian population. Coll Antropol 2016;40(1):23–28.
  9. Preeti N, Balaji Rao B, Anniger RG. A study of tooth size, symmetry and sexual dimorphism. JFMT 1999;16:10–13.
  10. Rai B, Jain R, Duhan J, et al. Importance of maxillary first molar for sex determination. Internet J Dent Sci 2007;4:2.
  11. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Kerewsky RS. Sexual dimorphism in the buccolingual tooth diameter. J Dent Res 1966;45(6):1819. DOI: 10.1177/00220345660450064301.
  12. Perzigian AJ. The dentition of the Indian Knoll skeletal population: odontometrics and cup number. Am J Phys Anthropol 1976;44(1):113–121. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330440116.
  13. Ghose LJ, Baghdady V. Analysis of the Iraqi dentition: Mesiodistal crown diameters of permanent teeth. J Dent Res 1979;58(3):1047–1054. DOI: 10.1177/00220345790580030301.
  14. Stroud JL, Buschang PH, Goaz PW. Sexual dimorphism in mesiodistal dentin and enamel thickness. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994;23(3):169–171. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.23.3.7835519.
  15. Hattab FN, al-Khateeb S, Sultan I. Mesiodistal crown diameters of permanent teeth in Jordanians. Arch Oral Biol 1996;41(7):641–645. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9969(96)00066-0.
  16. Rai B, Dhattarwal SK, Anand SC. Sex determination from tooth. Medico-legal update 2008;8(1):3–5.
  17. Ghodosi A, Mosharraf R, Nia FF. Sexual variation in bucco-lingual dimensions in Iranian dentition. Inter J Dental Anthropol 2008;12:1–7.
  18. Vodanovic M, Demo Z, Njemirovskij V, et al. Odontometrics: a useful method for sex determination in an archaeological skeletal population? J Archaeolog Sci 2007;34(6):905–913. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2006.09.004.
  19. Iscan MY, Kedici PS. Sexual variation in bucco-lingual dimensions in Turkish dentition. Forensic Sci Int 2003;137(2-3):160–164. DOI: 10.1016/S0379-0738(03)00349-9.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.