Journal of Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology

Register      Login

VOLUME 2 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2017 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

An Insight into the Surface of Dental Implants

Hina Kausher, Devendra PS Chonkkar

Citation Information : Kausher H, Chonkkar DP. An Insight into the Surface of Dental Implants. J Mahatma Gandhi Univ Med Sci Tech 2017; 2 (1):23-28.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10057-0026

License: CC BY 3.0

Published Online: 01-04-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

How to cite this article

Kausher H, Padiyar N, Kaurani P, Meena S, Chonkkar DPS. An Insight into the Surface of Dental Implants. J Mahatma Gandhi Univ Med Sci Tech 2017;2(1):23-28.


  1. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Exp studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969 Jan;3(2):81-100.
  2. Electron microscopic analysis of the bone-titanium interface. Acta Orthop Scand 1983 Feb;54(1):45-52.
  3. On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):63-74.
  4. Direct bone anchorage of oral implants: clinical and experimental considerations of the concept of osseointegration. Int J Prosthodont 1990 Jan;3(1):30-41.
  5. Biologic determinants of bone formation for osseointegration: clues for future clinical improvements. J Prosthet Dent 1998 Oct;80(4):439-449.
  6. Histologic evaluation of early human bone response to different implant surfaces. J Periodontol 2006 Oct;77(10):1736-1743.
  7. Status of surface treatment in endosseous implant: a literary overview. Indian J Dent Res 2010 Jul-Sep;21(3):433-438.
  8. Materials for enhancing cell adhesion by immobilization of cell-adhesive peptide. J Biomed Mater Res 1991 Nov;25(11):1325-1337.
  9. Implant surfaces. Dent Clin North Am 2006 Jul;50(3):323-338, v.
  10. Effects of titanium surface topograpy in bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Impl Res 2009 Jul;(Suppl 4):172-184.
  11. The effects of implant surface topography on the behavior of cells. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988 Winter;3(4):231-246.
  12. Mechanical, thermal, chemical and electrochemical surface treatment of titanium. In: Titanium in medicine. Berlin: Springer; 2001. p. 231-266.
  13. Advances in dental implant materials and tissue regeneration. Periodontology 2000 2006 Jun;41(1):136-156.
  14. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999 May;45(2):75-83.
  15. Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography. Biomaterials 1996 Jan;17(1):15-22.
  16. Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992 Fall;7(3):302-310.
  17. Direct assessment of profilometric roughness variability from typical implant surface types. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 2004 Jul-Aug;19(4):510-516.
  18. Use of Ti-coated replicas to investigate the effects on fibroblast shape of surfaces with varying roughness and constant chemical composition. J Biomed Mater Res 2002 Jun;60(3):434-444.
  19. Surface characterization of implant materials c.p. Ti, Ti-6Al-7Nb and Ti-6Al-4V with different pretreatments. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1999 Jan;10(1):35-46.
  20. Advancing dental implant surface technology – from micron- to nanotopography. Biomaterials 2008 Oct;29(28):3822-3835.
  21. Preparation of bioactive microporous titanium surface by a new two-step chemical treatment. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1998 Mar;9(3):121-128.
  22. Electrochemical surface modification of titanium in dentistry. Dent Mater J 2009 Jan;28(1):20-36.
  23. Bone response to surface modified titanium implants: studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses and morphology. Biomaterials 1994 Oct;15(13):1062-1074.
  24. Bone response to surface-modified titanium implants: studies on the early tissue response to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses. Biomaterials 1996 Mar;17(6):605-616.
  25. Glow discharge plasma treatment for surface cleaning and modification of metallic biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res 1997 Apr;35(1):49-73.
  26. Surface energy characterization of unalloyed titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1994 Dec;28(12):1419-1425.
  27. Plasma-sprayed titanium-I.M.Z. implant. J Oral Implantol 1986;12(3):494-497.
  28. In vitro investigation of titanium and hydroxyapatite dental implant surfaces using a rat bone marrow stromal cell culture system. Biomaterials 2002 Aug;23(15):3235-3245.
  29. Materials characteristics of uncoated/ceramic-coated implant materials. Adv Dent Res 1999 Jun;13(1):21-26.
  30. Surface modification of stainless steel by plasma-based fluorine and silver dual ion implantation and deposition. Dent Mater J 2009 Nov;28(6):735-742.
  31. Application of magnetron sputtering for producing ceramic coatings on implant materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 1993 Mar;4(1):28-34.
  32. A histological evaluation of TiO2-gritblasted and Ca-P magnetron sputter coated implants placed into the trabecular bone of the goat: part 2. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000 Aug;11(4):314-324.
  33. A mechanical evaluation of TiO2-gritblasted and Ca-P magnetron sputter coated implants placed into the trabecular bone of the goat: part 1. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000 Aug;11(4):305-313.
  34. Study of the surface characteristics of magnetron-sputter calcium phosphate coatings. J Biomed Mater Res 1994 Dec;28(12):1477-1484.
  35. Characterization and biocompatibility of a titanium dental implant with a laser irradiated and dual-acid etched surface. Biomed Mater Eng 2007 Jan;17(1):53-68.
  36. Thermal characterization of commercially pure titanium for dental applications. Mater Res 2007 Sep;10(3):241-246.
  37. Evaluation of titanium implants with surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias. Braz Oral Res 2009 Apr-Jun;23(2):137-143.
  38. Laser surface modification of Ti implants to improve osseointegration. J Phys Conf Ser 2007;59(1):662.
  39. Biological aging of implant surfaces and their restoration with ultraviolet light treatment: a novel understanding of osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012 Jul-Aug;27(4):753-761.
  40. Effect of ultraviolet photoactivation of titanium on osseointegration in a rat model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010 Mar-Apr;25(2):287-294.
  41. Ultraviolet photofunctionalization of titanium implants. Oral Craniofac Tissue Eng 2012;2(2):151-158.
  42. Risedronate directly inhibits osteoclast differentiation and inflammatory bone loss. Biol Pharm Bull 2009 Jul;32(7):1193-1198.
  43. Bone response to calcium phosphate-coated and bisphosphonate-immobilized titanium implants. Biomaterials 2002 Jul;23(14):2879-2885.
  44. Stimulation of bone formation in vitro and in rodents by statins. Science 1999 Dec;286(5446):1946-1949.
  45. Statin given perorally to adult rats increases cancellous bone mass and compressive strength. Calcif Tissue Int 2001 Nov;69(5):299-304.
  46. The effects of combined gentamicin-hydroxyapatite coating for cementless joint prostheses on the reduction of infection rates in a rabbit infection prophylaxis model. Biomaterials 2006 Sep;27(26):4627-4634.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.